Sample Post: Testing the Recovery Reviews Content Pipeline

Key Takeaways

• The Astro Content Collection schema is configured and validating frontmatter correctly.
• All YMYL trust fields (disclaimer, sources, reviewed_by, review_date, updated) are available.
• The AI content pipeline can target this structure for every generated post.

Introduction

This is a sample post created to verify the Recovery Reviews site architecture. It uses the full expanded frontmatter schema defined in src/content/config.ts, including YMYL-specific fields for health content credibility.

If this post builds successfully, the Content Collection is working as expected.

What This Post Tests

Frontmatter Validation

Every field in the schema is populated here so we can confirm Astro parses and validates them at build time. Required fields (title, description, date, category, tags, author) will throw build errors if missing.

Markdown Rendering

Standard Markdown features should render correctly:

• Bold text and italic text
• Links to external resources
• Code blocks and inline code
• Headings at multiple levels (H2, H3)

Content Structure

This post follows the recommended structure from the Research Brief:

1. Key Takeaways — summary bullets at the top
2. Introduction — context and hook
3. Body sections — organized under H2/H3 headings
4. FAQ — long-tail questions at the bottom
5. Disclaimer — rendered from frontmatter

FAQ

What is the purpose of this post?

This post exists solely to test the Content Collection schema and build pipeline. It will be removed before launch.

How do I create a new post?

Add a new .md file to src/content/blog/ with the required frontmatter fields. Run npm run build to validate.

What happens if a required field is missing?

Astro will throw a build error identifying the missing field and the file that caused it.

---

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.